Where we
live and work

The short version. Five minutes, mostly pictures. Everything here links to the long page if you want the reasoning underneath it.

Written 30 August 2026, for Munim, Janika, and Munim's mum and dad.

Ink illustration of two people sitting at opposite ends of a table drawn as a stretch of open water, one shore with a terraced house and the other with a pine tree, a calendar resting between them.

The plan we favour: move to Britain

December 2026 The earliest we are living in the same house with both of us working. Nobody has to approve this and nothing can refuse it.
May 2027 The earliest Janika is an American permanent resident, arriving able to work on the day she lands.

If we stay in America instead, those two things collapse into the same day, and that day is February 2028 at the very best. If one question gets asked along the way, which happens to about half of these applications, it becomes late 2028. That is the number Munim saw, and it is real. It just belongs to one of the three plans rather than to all of them.

The recommendation below is Britain, and it was tested by an independent lawyer who was given the argument without being told which answer we wanted. It survived, with one correction that is folded in.

The whole thing on one chart

Three plans, and the same green card application in all three. The only thing that changes is which country we sit in while it is decided. That turns out to change almost everything else.

Stay in AmericaMove to BritainMove to Finland
When do we live in the same house? Feb 2028 Dec 2026 Feb 2027
When can Janika work? Feb 2028 Throughout. She never stops. Throughout. She never stops.
When can Munim work? Throughout, on his student permission Throughout. He is a citizen. Only once Finland grants him a permit
Can Munim leave the country? No. Not once, for about a year. Yes, freely Yes, freely
When is Munim an American permanent resident? Mar 2027 May 2027 May 2027
When is Janika? Feb 2028 May 2027, the same day as him May 2027, the same day as him
Does anyone have to say yes? An American officer Nobody A Finnish officer, for Munim
Best case in every column, meaning nobody asks a single question at any stage, so read these as the top of the range rather than as the plan. About half of these applications attract at least one query. That pushes every date in the America column out by eight months and moves almost nothing in the Britain column.

The green card arrives at roughly the same time on all three plans. What differs is how much of our life we spend waiting for it.

The same two years, drawn twice

Both charts cover the identical stretch of time, from this September to the autumn of 2028. Green means living where we want to be and allowed to work. Red means neither.

Sept 2026 2027 2028 STAY IN AMERICA Munim Cannot leave America Permanent resident, working Janika In Finland. Cannot live or work in America. Able to work at last Together from February 2028 MOVE TO BRITAIN Munim Living and working Also an American permanent resident Janika Living and working Also an American permanent resident Together from December 2026, fifteen months earlier
Both charts assume the best case. On the America plan the red bar is the whole cost: about seventeen months in which Janika is in Finland and Munim cannot leave the country to visit her without abandoning the application. On the Britain plan there is no red bar, because neither of us is waiting for permission to live or work anywhere.

Why Janika's date moves by fifteen months

Munim believed two things, and both are right. Marrying does give Janika a green card off the back of his: the law gives a husband or wife the same category and the same place in the queue as the person applying. And if they are not married by the time he applies, she gets added afterwards. Nothing about the plan has broken. What changes is only the building she walks into, and that is the whole fifteen months.

Janika has always come to America as a tourist, on the scheme letting European citizens visit for ninety days without applying for a visa first. The trade for that convenience is a rule that has been on the books for decades: if that is how you last entered, you cannot switch to a green card while you are inside the country. You are dealt with at an American embassy abroad instead.

There is one exception: being married to an American citizen. Munim is British, so it can never open for her, however long he holds a green card. This is not a new rule and Janika has done nothing wrong. Being a tourist on the visa waiver is precisely the situation it was written for.

CLOSED TO HER, PERMANENTLY Apply from inside America She would have to already be in the country, then wait about a year for a work permit before she could take a job. The visa waiver rule shuts this door. The only key is marriage to an American. OPEN, AND BETTER ANYWAY Apply at an embassy abroad She stays in her own life, working, until the interview. Then she flies in already a permanent resident. She can work from the day she lands. No waiting for a permit at all.
The door on the left was never open to her, on any plan. So choosing the embassy route costs nothing that was ever available, and hands her something the other route cannot: the ability to work on day one.

So where does February 2028 come from?

From the order things happen in, not from anything about Janika.

If Munim stays in America, he becomes a permanent resident on his own, first. Janika then follows separately, and following has its own paperwork stage that must be filed and processed before an embassy will even open a file on her. That stage takes just over seven months in a typical case. Stack it behind his own application and she arrives February 2028 at the earliest.

Go through the embassy together and that stage does not exist. She is on his application from the start rather than chasing it afterwards, so the seven months and the year of waiting for a work permit both disappear.

Does moving country change the tax bill?

Munim asked whether treaties exist to stop the same money being taxed twice. They do, and for the two of us personally they work. Wages and dividends both get relief, and the combined burden ends up being the higher of the two countries' tax rather than the sum of them.

Where they stop working is the company, not us

Eulia is registered in Delaware, which makes it permanently subject to American company tax. Moving house does not change that. But if we then run it from somewhere else, that country usually decides the company is theirs too, and now two countries both claim it.

You would expect a treaty to settle that. On this one question it does not. The British treaty says that if the two tax offices cannot agree whose company it is, the company gets almost no treaty protection. The Finnish treaty gives it none at all.

None of it bites yet, and that is the practical answer. The company has no profit, so there is no double tax to relieve. What moving costs today is not tax: it is roughly four to fifteen thousand dollars a year in accountants and filings, to keep two sets of books and arrive at a bill of nothing. It becomes real the moment there is profit, and then it needs an actual tax adviser rather than a page like this one.

What happens if it is refused

This matters more than the chances do, so it is worth being exact. In the first half of this year the American government decided 11,896 of these applications and refused 6,486 of them, which is 54.5 per cent. That is from their own published spreadsheet, not from a law firm's blog.

But it should not be applied to Munim, and nobody can give him one that should. Of everyone who applied in that period 2,270 were born in China and 1,469 in India. Sixty-five were born in Britain. No published figure adjusts for the strength of a case or who prepared it. Anyone quoting a personal percentage here is guessing.

Which is fine, because the Britain plan is better whether it is refused or not, and that is a stronger claim than any percentage.

Look at what happens when it succeeds, not only when it fails

On the America plan, even the good ending is a year and a half apart. Munim gets his green card, and Janika is still in Finland, still unable to work in America, waiting for a process that cannot begin until he already has it. That is the version where everything goes right.

On the Britain plan, the bad ending is that we lose a fee and some months while already living together and both working. Nothing about our daily life turns on the answer.

And it need not take a year to find out

For about three thousand dollars the American government will decide the first stage in around nine weeks instead of a year. So the real choice is not between a fast plan and a slow one. It is between finding out early and finding out late, and finding out early costs money rather than time.

Ink illustration of the same two people now sitting side by side on one bench on the same shore, the terraced house and the pine tree both behind them.

What is still genuinely unknown

Three things, listed because a page that only tells you what it knows is not being honest.

What the words mean

Green card
Permanent permission to live and work in America without an employer sponsoring you. Not citizenship, and not a visa.
The petition, and the application
Two steps people run together. The petition asks America to accept that Munim's work is worth having; the application is the request for the green card itself. The first has to succeed before the second can.
The visa waiver
The scheme letting Finnish, British and most European citizens visit for ninety days without a visa. Convenient going in, restrictive coming out.
Embassy processing
Having the green card decided at an American embassy abroad rather than from inside America. You are interviewed there and arrive already a permanent resident.

Where the detail lives